In radiation therapy, precision is everything. For decades, permanent tattoos have been a standard practice to ensure accuracy during treatment. These small, often inconspicuous dots allow for consistent alignment of radiation beams, ensuring that treatment is delivered exactly where needed. However, as technology advances and patient-centered care evolves, the use of permanent tattoos has become a topic of debate among radiation therapists and healthcare teams.
Why Are Permanent Tattoos Used in Radiation Therapy?
Permanent tattoos, small dots placed on the skin, have long been a practical solution to ensure that every session aligns perfectly with the treatment plan. These tattoos serve as fixed, reliable reference points, allowing radiation therapists to quickly and accurately position patients in alignment with their treatment plan.
Unlike temporary markers, which can fade or widen between sessions, permanent tattoos provide consistency that reduces setup time and ensures precision. These marks help therapists position patients consistently, reducing errors and maximizing the treatment's effectiveness.
Concerns About Permanent Tattoos
While these tattoos offer practical benefits, they are not without controversy. For many patients, the marks become a lasting reminder of a challenging chapter in their lives. For some, this is a source of pride—a badge of resilience. Some even choose to expand these small tattoos into meaningful designs.
In a U.K.-based survey of breast cancer survivors, 59% of respondents who could see the tattoos on their breastbone after cancer treatment said they were “never bothered” by them. On the other hand, 27% of participants viewed the tattoos negatively, with 14% mentioning that the marks influenced their clothing choices.
In another survey of young women diagnosed with breast cancer before age 40, around 60% reported “negative” or “very negative” feelings about receiving a tattoo as part of treatment. Remarkably, 78% said they would opt for tattoo-free treatment, even if it meant extra costs, travel time, or other added efforts.
Cultural and personal preferences also play a significant role in the decision to use permanent tattoos. For some, tattoos may conflict with deeply held religious beliefs, while others might view them as a disruption to their aesthetic preferences or identity.
Advances in medical imaging and positioning devices have provided alternatives, enabling these patients to undergo treatment without compromising their personal values. This shift reflects the growing emphasis on tailoring care to individual needs, but it also underscores how sensitive and varied the topic can be.
Alternatives to Permanent Tattoos
In response to these concerns, many clinics are exploring new methods and technologies to ensure accuracy while respecting patient preferences.
InkRight™ semi-permanent tattoos provide a hygienic, efficient, and convenient alternative to permanent tattooing, making them ideal for clinical applications. Available in dot and crosshair designs, the InkRight tattoo is immediately visible after application and stays visible for up to two weeks. The tattoo can be reapplied for extended treatments.
Unlike other methods, InkRight semi-permanent tattoos do not need to be kept frozen and do not require water to apply.
Looking Ahead
As radiation therapy continues to evolve, so do the methods used to deliver care. While permanent tattoos remain a reliable tool, advancements in technology and a growing emphasis on patient-centered care drive the adoption of alternatives. By embracing these changes and fostering open communication, healthcare teams can ensure they provide both effective and compassionate treatments.
If you are interested in learning more about InkRight Semi-permanent tattoos for your facility, please reach out to your Radiation Therapy Account Manager or email info@beekley.com
Megan Sargalski
Marketing Communications Specialist
