ARTICLE
April 24, 2014

Why all Radiologists Need Uniform-Density Skin Markers

Breast Imaging Radiologists already have an extremely difficult task. They need to diagnose cancer at its earliest stage without a shadow of a doubt, even if images might appear comparable to trying to find Waldo in a candy cane factory.

These days, breast density plays a huge role in this challenging job for doctors with 40% of women presenting with dense breasts. So why would a radiologist want to add density to images when it isn't necessary? Easy, they wouldn't.

This clinical study proves why it is critical for skin markers to be of uniform-density when it comes to diagnosing a patient completely and correctly in mammography.

 

Sarah Gomes
Account Manager
Print Friendly Version of this pageGet a PDF version of this webpage



Disqus Comments

Comments for

blog comments powered by Disqus
RECOMMENDED POSTS
Industry News
Are you experiencing a blurring or slinky artifact with your skin markers in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT)? Using skin markers intended for 2-D mammography could be your culprit. DBT or 3-D mammography is very sensitive to densities – this is what makes it so great...
Industry News
Can the type of skin marker used make a difference in revealing potential breast cancers? While there is no substitute for the trained eye of a radiologist who specializes in breast imaging, the type of mammography skin marker used to identify a post-surgical scar,...
Industry News
There is no doubt that digital breast tomosynthesis (3-D Mammography) has launched us into a new age of mammography. The clarity and number of images helps radiologists see and examine more breast tissue detail than ever before.  Detection rates of early stage...